Bobcat CT2535 vs Case IH Farmall Compact 35C | Side-by-side comparison | ITC Resource Center
Compare Tractors
See horsepower, lift capacity, hydraulic flow, and the numbers that matter to your work. Up to 4 machines, side by side, in graphs built to show which tractor is better at what.
Every published spec, side by side, including the details the graphs above don't chart.
Spec
BobcatCT2535
Case IHFarmall Compact 35C
PTO Power
29.4 hp
28 hp
Alternator
alternator
Not Published
Air Cleaner
Dry type, replaceable
Not Published
Engine Type
Diesel
Diesel, naturally aspirated
Fuel System
Common Rail Direct Injection (CRDI)
Common Rail Direct Injection
Displacement
111.4 in³
115.9 in³
Engine Model
Daedong 0.5 gal 3-cyl diesel
n/a
No. of Cylinders
3
3
Rated Engine Speed
2600 rpm
Not Published
Cooling System Type
Water cooled
Not Published
Engine Manufacturer
Daedong
Not Published
Engine Power (Gross)
34.9 hp
35 hp
Engine Emissions Constraints
Tier 4
Tier 4
Weight with ROPS and Loader
Not Applicable
Not Published
Weight with Cab and Loader
1652.00 KG
Not Applicable
Warranty Length & Coverage
24 months / 1,500 hours (whichever occurs first)
Not Published
Pump Type
NOT FOUND — no source explicitly names the pump type (e.g. gear, piston, etc.) for the CT2535. The Bobcat EU page lists 'Implement pump type · 26.00' but this appears to be a flow value (L/min), not a pump type descriptor.
Not Published
Steering Flow
16.90
Not Published
Implement Flow
26.00
Not Published
Total Hydraulic Flow
11.4 gpm
8.2 gpm
Hydraulic System Type
NOT FOUND — no source explicitly labels a 'Hydraulic System Type' field for the CT2535. The EU Bobcat page lists 'Power steering pump (4 port)' and separate implement flow, suggesting an open-center or load-sensing split system, but no source uses that label explicitly.
We'll send the full side-by-side spec sheet to your inbox so you can compare offline, or share this exact comparison with a link. No marketing follow-up.
