Bobcat CT2535 vs Yanmar YT235 | Side-by-side comparison | ITC Resource Center
Compare Tractors
See horsepower, lift capacity, hydraulic flow, and the numbers that matter to your work. Up to 4 machines, side by side, in graphs built to show which tractor is better at what.
Every published spec, side by side, including the details the graphs above don't chart.
Spec
BobcatCT2535
YanmarYT235
PTO Power
29.4 hp
27 hp
Alternator
alternator
40 A, 12 V
Air Cleaner
Dry type, replaceable
Dual stage cyclonic (resin 5.5 in.)
Engine Type
Diesel
3-cylinder, naturally aspirated diesel
Fuel System
Common Rail Direct Injection (CRDI)
Common rail direct injection
Displacement
111.4 in³
100.2 in³
Engine Model
Daedong 0.5 gal 3-cyl diesel
n/a
No. of Cylinders
3
3
Rated Engine Speed
2600 rpm
2800 rpm
Cooling System Type
Water cooled
Liquid cooled
Engine Manufacturer
Daedong
YANMAR
Engine Power (Gross)
34.9 hp
34.2 hp
Engine Emissions Constraints
Tier 4
Tier 4
Weight with ROPS and Loader
Not Applicable
3,471 lb
Weight with Cab and Loader
1652.00 KG
Not Applicable
Warranty Length & Coverage
24 months / 1,500 hours (whichever occurs first)
Tractor: 24 months or 2,000 hours; Powertrain: 10 years or 3,000 hours; Attachments: 1-year limited warranty
Pump Type
NOT FOUND — no source explicitly names the pump type (e.g. gear, piston, etc.) for the CT2535. The Bobcat EU page lists 'Implement pump type · 26.00' but this appears to be a flow value (L/min), not a pump type descriptor.
Not Published
Steering Flow
16.90
4.1 gpm
Implement Flow
26.00
7.1 gpm
Total Hydraulic Flow
11.4 gpm
11.2 gpm
Hydraulic System Type
NOT FOUND — no source explicitly labels a 'Hydraulic System Type' field for the CT2535. The EU Bobcat page lists 'Power steering pump (4 port)' and separate implement flow, suggesting an open-center or load-sensing split system, but no source uses that label explicitly.
We'll send the full side-by-side spec sheet to your inbox so you can compare offline, or share this exact comparison with a link. No marketing follow-up.
