Case IH Farmall 65A vs John Deere 4066M eHydro
Every published spec for both machines, side by side. The verdict below is computed straight from the spec sheets, not opinion.
Across 8 measurable specs, the Case IH Farmall 65A leads 4 categories to 3 (1 tied). Machine pages: Case IH Farmall 65A and John Deere 4066M eHydro.
Want a third or fourth machine in the mix? Open this matchup in the comparison tool and add up to two more.
Category Verdict
| Spec | Case IH Farmall 65A | John Deere 4066M eHydro |
|---|---|---|
| Engine HP (hp) | 64 hp | ▲ 65 hp |
| PTO HP (hp) | 50 hp | ▲ 57 hp |
| Weight (lb) | ▲ 6,834 lb | 3,770 lb |
| Loader Lift (lb) | ▲ 3,153 lb | 2,396 lb |
| 3-Pt Lift (24 in) (lb) | ▲ 4,300 lb | 2,500 lb |
| Lift Height (in) | ▲ 120 in | 112 in |
| Hydraulic Flow (gpm) | 12.6 gpm | ▲ 15.9 gpm |
| Travel Speed (mph) | 18.6 mph | 18.6 mph |
Full Spec Sheet
Every published spec, side by side, including the details the graphs above don't chart.
| Spec | Case IHFarmall 65A | John Deere4066M eHydro |
|---|
| Engine Manufacturer | FPT | Yanmar |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Model | S8000 | 4TNV86CHT-MJT |
| Engine Type | 3-cylinder, Tier 4 B/Final, FPT turbocharged & aftercooled | Turbocharged 4-cylinder Diesel |
| No. of Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
| Displacement | 178.8 in³ | 127.6 in³ |
| Rated Engine Speed | 2300 rpm | 2600 rpm |
| Engine Power (Gross) | 64 hp | 65 hp |
| PTO Power | 50 hp | 57 hp |
| Engine Emissions Constraints | Tier 4 | Tier 4 |
| Cooling System Type | Liquid-cooled | Liquid-cooled |
| Air Cleaner | Not Published | Dual element (dry type with safety element) |
| Fuel System | Electronic high pressure common rail | High-pressure common rail direct injection |
| Alternator | 120 A | 75 A, 12 V |
Case IH Farmall 65A vs John Deere 4066M eHydro: Quick Answers
- Which has more horsepower, the Case IH Farmall 65A or the John Deere 4066M eHydro?
- The John Deere 4066M eHydro leads on engine hp at 65 hp hp, compared to 64 hp hp for the Case IH Farmall 65A.
- Which has more PTO horsepower, the Case IH Farmall 65A or the John Deere 4066M eHydro?
- The John Deere 4066M eHydro leads on pto hp at 57 hp hp, compared to 50 hp hp for the Case IH Farmall 65A.
- Which is heavier, the Case IH Farmall 65A or the John Deere 4066M eHydro?
- The Case IH Farmall 65A leads on weight at 6,834 lb lb, compared to 3,770 lb lb for the John Deere 4066M eHydro.
- Which has more loader lift capacity, the Case IH Farmall 65A or the John Deere 4066M eHydro?
- The Case IH Farmall 65A leads on loader lift at 3,153 lb lb, compared to 2,396 lb lb for the John Deere 4066M eHydro.
- Which has more three-point hitch lift capacity, the Case IH Farmall 65A or the John Deere 4066M eHydro?
- The Case IH Farmall 65A leads on 3-pt lift (24 in) at 4,300 lb lb, compared to 2,500 lb lb for the John Deere 4066M eHydro.