Case IH Farmall 75C vs John Deere 5075M | Side-by-side comparison | ITC Resource Center
Compare Tractors
See horsepower, lift capacity, hydraulic flow, and the numbers that matter to your work. Up to 4 machines, side by side, in graphs built to show which tractor is better at what.
2 of 4 selected
n/a
CaseIHFarmall75C
n/a
JohnDeere5075M
Comparison loaded for 2 tractors.
The headline numbers at a glance.
Case IH Farmall 75CJohn Deere 5075M
ITCUSA.COMITCUSA.COMITCUSA.COM
Engine HPhp
▲74 hp
73.8 hp
PTO HPhp
▲61 hp
57.7 hp
Weightlb
6,548 lb
8,140 lb
8,580 lb
8,765 lb
▲9,185 lb
2WD OOS2WD CabMFWD OOSMFWD Cab
Loader Liftlb
2,734 lb
3,335 lb
2,460 lb
2,394 lb
3,117 lb
3,406 lb
3,104 lb
▲3,891 lb
520M NSL520M MSL540M NSL540M MSL540R600M NSL600M MSL
16F/16R PowrReverser, top gear D-4: 20.5 mph (30K gearing); 23.9 mph (40K gearing), with 480/70R28 rear tires at 2200 rpm
Clutch
Wet clutch
Wet
Differential Lock & Limited Slip Options
Mechanical; MFD front axle with limited slip
Electrohydraulic rear differential lock
Frame Type
Not Published
Cast iron mid-frame
Steering
Hydrostatic power steering
Not Published
Brakes
Hydraulic wet disc
Hydraulically actuated wet disc brakes
Seat Suspension & Adjustability
Not Published
OOS: isolated mechanical seat standard (fore/aft, weight, lumbar adjust) or air suspension seat optional; Cab: mechanical seat standard or air suspension seat optional; adjustable weight range 88-330 lb
Front Axle Type
MFD with limited slip; electrohydraulic engagement
We'll send the full side-by-side spec sheet to your inbox so you can compare offline, or share this exact comparison with a link. No marketing follow-up.